It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LCNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LCNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LCNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.
LCNB is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
MOFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
LCNB | MOFG | LCNB / MOFG | |
Capitalization | 211M | 369M | 57% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 12.078 | 25.469 | 47% |
P/E Ratio | 13.73 | 17.17 | 80% |
Revenue | 67.9M | 163M | 42% |
Total Cash | 23.1M | 71M | 33% |
Total Debt | 217M | 418M | 52% |
LCNB | MOFG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LCNB's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (96). This means that LCNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
LCNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (68). This means that LCNB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
LCNB's SMR Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (56). This means that LCNB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
MOFG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LCNB (42). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to LCNB’s over the last 12 months.
LCNB's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (14). This means that LCNB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
LCNB | MOFG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago55% | 12 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 3 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago54% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VVJEX | 13.03 | 0.19 | +1.48% |
Voya VACS Series MCV Fund | |||
ABCVX | 24.34 | 0.17 | +0.70% |
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Inv | |||
FTAWX | 13.71 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% A | |||
HFERX | 44.75 | -0.17 | -0.38% |
Janus Henderson European Focus N | |||
FSYJX | 8.88 | -0.04 | -0.45% |
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Eq |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCNB has been closely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCNB jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCNB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LCNB | 100% | -0.35% | ||
PFIS - LCNB | 68% Closely correlated | +4.10% | ||
MCBS - LCNB | 67% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
BHB - LCNB | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
MOFG - LCNB | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
WTBA - LCNB | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MOFG | 100% | +1.87% | ||
FMBH - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
THFF - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
HTBK - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
GSBC - MOFG | 83% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
WSFS - MOFG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.10% | ||
More |