Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCCX vs LOLDX
LDCCX vs LOLDX Comparison
Open Charts LDCCX vs LOLDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond C
Price$9.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.85M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32B
LDCCX vs LOLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCCX vs. LOLDX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCCX is a Hold and LOLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. LDCCX (611M). LOLDX pays higher dividends than LDCCX: LOLDX (5.28) vs LDCCX (3.99). LDCCX was incepted earlier than LOLDX: LDCCX (8 years) vs LOLDX (8 years). LDCCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCCX (78.00). LOLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDCCX: LOLDX (0) vs LDCCX (1500). LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. LDCCX (4.76). LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 14.25 vs. LDCCX (7.67).
| LDCCX | LOLDX | LDCCX / LOLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.32 | 388% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.32 | 425% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.839 | 2.509 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 611M | 42.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.99 | 5.28 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.76 | 6.26 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.70 | 14.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.67 | 14.25 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement