Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDLKX vs PLCCX
LDLKX vs PLCCX Comparison
Open Charts LDLKX vs PLCCX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.34B
PIMCO Low Duration C-2
Price$9.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
LDLKX vs PLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLKX vs. PLCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLKX is a Hold and PLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. PLCCX (6.63B). LDLKX pays higher dividends than PLCCX: LDLKX (4.96) vs PLCCX (3.35). LDLKX was incepted earlier than PLCCX: LDLKX (10 years) vs PLCCX (5 years). PLCCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than LDLKX (0.63). PLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 497.00 vs. LDLKX (92.00). LDLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLCCX: LDLKX (0) vs PLCCX (1000). LDLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. PLCCX (4.78).
| LDLKX | PLCCX | LDLKX / PLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.34 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.34 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.367 | 1.847 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 6.63B | 638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 3.35 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 4.78 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.34 | 9.43 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.42 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement