71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LEAD vs LW
LEAD vs LW Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs LW
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
Price$69.80
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$185
CapitalizationN/A
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$77.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.17%)
Volume$1.19K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
LEAD vs. LW commentary
Oct 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a Buy and LW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW: Fundamental Ratings
LW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | LW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEAD has been closely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEAD jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| HUBB - LEAD | 66% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| J - LEAD | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| LIN - LEAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| LW - LEAD | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| NVDA - LEAD | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.05% | ||
More | ||||
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LW | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| RSGUF - LW | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.08% | ||
| IRCKF - LW | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| POST - LW | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
| ATPC - LW | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.49% | ||
| K - LW | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||