Advertisement
LW vs POST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a Buy and POST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- POST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- POST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LW (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.99% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2026.
POST is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.21% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| LW | POST | LW / POST | |
| Capitalization | 7.23B | 4.14B | 174% |
| EBITDA | 988M | 1.42B | 70% |
| Gain YTD | 27.620 | -7.713 | -358% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.26 | 15.34 | 165% |
| Revenue | 6.61B | 8.45B | 78% |
| Total Cash | 68.2M | 269M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 3.94B | 7.63B | 52% |
LW | POST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LW's Valuation (24) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (59). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.
POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (100). This means that POST’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's SMR Rating (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (74). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.
LW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (60). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.
LW's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (72). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.
| LW | POST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JUST | 107.82 | 0.95 | +0.89% |
| Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
| AFGE | 16.19 | 0.05 | +0.31% |
| American Financial Group | |||
| BUFS | 25.06 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | |||
| IXN | 132.68 | -0.28 | -0.21% |
| iShares Global Tech ETF | |||
| FVC | 40.10 | -0.21 | -0.51% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5 | |||
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.
POST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POST has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POST jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POST | 100% | -1.67% | ||
| MDLZ - POST | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| GIS - POST | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| CAG - POST | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| KHC - POST | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| HSY - POST | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||