Ad is loading...
LEQAX vs NLSAX
LEQAX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts LEQAX vs NLSAX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$11.48
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.56M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.1B
LEQAX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQAX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQAX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.1B vs. LEQAX (43.6M). LEQAX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: LEQAX (0.53) vs NLSAX (0.00). LEQAX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: LEQAX (12 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). LEQAX (2.53) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 932.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). LEQAX (6%) and NLSAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQAX: NLSAX (1000) vs LEQAX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. LEQAX (0.25). LEQAX (30.77) and NLSAX (29.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LEQAX | NLSAX | LEQAX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.47 | 1.68 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.53 | 1.68 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.192 | -1.733 | 530% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6M | 7.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.25 | 3.13 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.73 | 7.67 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.77 | 29.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.33 | 36.21 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...