Ad is loading...
LEQAX vs NLSAX
LEQAX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts LEQAX vs NLSAX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$11.82
Change-$0.06 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.35M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
LEQAX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQAX vs. NLSAX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQAX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. LEQAX (45.4M). LEQAX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: LEQAX (0.51) vs NLSAX (0.00). LEQAX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: LEQAX (12 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). LEQAX (2.53) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 932.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). LEQAX (6%) and NLSAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQAX: NLSAX (1000) vs LEQAX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. LEQAX (4.10). NLSAX (36.43) and LEQAX (36.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LEQAX | NLSAX | LEQAX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.47 | 1.68 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.53 | 1.68 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.864 | -0.108 | 5,413% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4M | 7.29B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | 5.25 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.89 | 10.75 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.33 | 36.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.61 | 40.71 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers