Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGFX vs RGEBX
LFGFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFGFX vs RGEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth F
Price$42.43
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.51M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.11
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
LFGFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGFX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. LFGFX (152M). LFGFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFGFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LFGFX (7 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). LFGFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). LFGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). LFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: LFGFX (0) vs RGEBX (250). LFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.12 vs. RGEBX (20.79). LFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 63.69 vs. RGEBX (38.92).
| LFGFX | RGEBX | LFGFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.09 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.715 | 12.136 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.12 | 20.79 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.06 | 43.03 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.69 | 38.92 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement