Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFMD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFMD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDOC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LFMD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +15.48% price change this week, while TDOC (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.35%.
LFMD is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2024.
TDOC is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
LFMD | TDOC | LFMD / TDOC | |
Capitalization | 263M | 2.85B | 9% |
EBITDA | -13.42M | -3.67B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 300.000 | -19.789 | -1,516% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 136M | 2.58B | 5% |
Total Cash | 15.3M | 1.03B | 1% |
Total Debt | 20.1M | 1.58B | 1% |
LFMD | TDOC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TDOC's Valuation (30) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFMD (80) in the null industry. This means that TDOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as TDOC (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to TDOC’s over the last 12 months.
TDOC's SMR Rating (98) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as LFMD (100) in the null industry. This means that TDOC’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TDOC (61) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to TDOC’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDOC (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to TDOC’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD | TDOC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 5 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago87% | 25 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VYRDX | 15.88 | 0.44 | +2.85% |
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II R6 | |||
RYTSX | 50.48 | 1.15 | +2.33% |
Rydex Transportation A | |||
WSCYX | 17.10 | 0.32 | +1.91% |
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Y | |||
GSRAX | 11.59 | 0.14 | +1.22% |
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr A | |||
HFQIX | 6.02 | 0.06 | +1.01% |
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income I |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFMD and APPN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFMD and APPN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFMD | 100% | +0.78% | ||
APPN - LFMD | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
PLTR - LFMD | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
AFRM - LFMD | 30% Poorly correlated | +9.47% | ||
TDOC - LFMD | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.58% | ||
DV - LFMD | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More |