LFMD
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.25 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
399.48M
43 days until earnings call
XYZ
Price
$65.32
Change
+$1.70 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.08B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFMD vs XYZ

Header iconLFMD vs XYZ Comparison
Open Charts LFMD vs XYZBanner chart's image
LifeMD
Price$14.05
Change-$0.25 (-1.75%)
Volume$1.59M
Capitalization399.48M
Block
Price$65.32
Change+$1.70 (+2.67%)
Volume$33.55K
Capitalization52.08B
LFMD vs XYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LFMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFMD vs. XYZ commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMD is a Buy and XYZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LFMD: $14.30 vs. XYZ: $63.62)
Brand notoriety: LFMD: Not notable vs. XYZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFMD: 146% vs. XYZ: 63%
Market capitalization -- LFMD: $399.48M vs. XYZ: $52.08B
LFMD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $399.48M. XYZ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $52.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFMD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXYZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LFMD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XYZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFMD is a better buy in the long-term than XYZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFMD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFMD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XYZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LFMD and XYZ are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LFMD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.16% price change this week, while XYZ (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFMD is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

XYZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.17% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XYZ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than LFMD($399M). LFMD YTD gains are higher at: 188.889 vs. XYZ (-25.144). XYZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. LFMD (-7.89M). XYZ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. LFMD (33.1M). LFMD has less debt than XYZ: LFMD (18.9M) vs XYZ (6.07B). XYZ has higher revenues than LFMD: XYZ (21.9B) vs LFMD (153M).
LFMDXYZLFMD / XYZ
Capitalization399M52.1B1%
EBITDA-7.89M790M-1%
Gain YTD188.889-25.144-751%
P/E RatioN/A4073.00-
Revenue153M21.9B1%
Total Cash33.1M9.02B0%
Total Debt18.9M6.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFMD vs XYZ: Fundamental Ratings
LFMD
XYZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
10059
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XYZ's Valuation (90) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LFMD (92) in the null industry. This means that XYZ’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.

LFMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XYZ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's SMR Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFMD (100) in the null industry. This means that XYZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFMD’s over the last 12 months.

LFMD's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as XYZ (53) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

LFMD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XYZ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFMDXYZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMP1.570.17
+12.14%
Camp4 Therapeutics Corp
GBCI41.581.13
+2.79%
Glacier Bancorp
THR27.330.30
+1.11%
Thermon Group Holdings
CMI316.342.08
+0.66%
Cummins
EVGO3.79-0.12
-3.07%
EVgo

XYZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYZ has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XYZ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYZ
1D Price
Change %
XYZ100%
+0.05%
COIN - XYZ
72%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
CLSK - XYZ
67%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
RIOT - XYZ
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
AFRM - XYZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
DBX - XYZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More