Ad is loading...
LGCAX vs RWBEX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
LGCAX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts LGCAX vs RWBEX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCAX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGCAX vs. RWBEX commentary
Nov 28, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCAX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LGCAX (15.5M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: RWBEX (1.55) vs LGCAX (0.63). LGCAX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: LGCAX (7 years) vs RWBEX (9 years). LGCAX (3.43) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.23). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RWBEX (32.00). RWBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: RWBEX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. RWBEX (11.86). LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.39 vs. RWBEX (26.34).
| LGCAX | RWBEX | LGCAX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.23 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.43 | 1.23 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.197 | 13.748 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.5M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.55 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 11.86 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.17 | 5.14 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.39 | 26.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers