Ad is loading...
LGCFX vs RWBEX
LGCFX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts LGCFX vs RWBEX
Lord Abbett Global Equity F
Price$15.94
Change+$1.15 (+7.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.79M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$60.46
Change+$3.89 (+6.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.98B
LGCFX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCFX vs. RWBEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LGCFX (134M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: RWBEX (1.19) vs LGCFX (0.56). LGCFX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: LGCFX (8 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). LGCFX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RWBEX (27.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWBEX: LGCFX (0) vs RWBEX (250). LGCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.30 vs. RWBEX (-11.29). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.64 vs. RWBEX (35.34).
| LGCFX | RWBEX | LGCFX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.21 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.278 | -10.420 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.19 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.30 | -11.29 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.19 | 0.38 | 3,474% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.64 | 35.34 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.52 | - |