Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCFX vs RWBEX
LGCFX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts LGCFX vs RWBEX
Lord Abbett Global Equity F
Price$18.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.84M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$68.72
Change+$0.24 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.86B
LGCFX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCFX vs. RWBEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. LGCFX (175M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: RWBEX (1.11) vs LGCFX (0.50). LGCFX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: LGCFX (8 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). LGCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RWBEX (27.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWBEX: LGCFX (0) vs RWBEX (250). LGCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. RWBEX (5.87). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.67 vs. RWBEX (43.71).
| LGCFX | RWBEX | LGCFX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.21 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.078 | 8.820 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.11 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 5.87 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.10 | 27.71 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.67 | 43.71 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement