Ad is loading...
LGCSX vs RWBEX
LGCSX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts LGCSX vs RWBEX
Lord Abbett Global Equity R4
Price$17.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.36M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$64.84
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.97B
LGCSX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCSX vs. RWBEX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCSX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. LGCSX (149M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than LGCSX: RWBEX (1.18) vs LGCSX (0.40). LGCSX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: LGCSX (8 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). LGCSX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). LGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RWBEX (27.00). LGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWBEX: LGCSX (0) vs RWBEX (250). LGCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. RWBEX (1.75). LGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.09 vs. RWBEX (48.77).
| LGCSX | RWBEX | LGCSX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.21 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.21 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.459 | 2.676 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 125B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.18 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 1.75 | 582% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.87 | 29.12 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.09 | 48.77 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...