Advertisement
LGHL vs TREE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGHL is a Hold and TREE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LGHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTREE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TREE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LGHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TREE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LGHL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TREE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.03% price change this week, while TREE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
LGHL is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
TREE is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.57% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Conglomerates (+2.77% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| LGHL | TREE | LGHL / TREE | |
| Capitalization | 3.14M | 487M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -28.94M | 74.2M | -39% |
| Gain YTD | -69.789 | -7.123 | 980% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | -2.48M | 972M | -0% |
| Total Cash | 11.2M | 126M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 5.39M | 567M | 1% |
TREE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LGHL | TREE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 25 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
Advertisement
LGHL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGHL and TOP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGHL and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGHL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGHL | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| TOP - LGHL | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| MEGL - LGHL | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| TREE - LGHL | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
| NDAQ - LGHL | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| BGC - LGHL | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||
TREE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TREE has been loosely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TREE jumps, then MC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TREE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TREE | 100% | +2.56% | ||
| MC - TREE | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| JEF - TREE | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| EVR - TREE | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| PJT - TREE | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| PIPR - TREE | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.73% | ||
More | ||||