Ad is loading...
LGLAX vs RGACX
LGLAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$43.80
Change-$0.29 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
LGLAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. LGLAX (6.42B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: RGACX (0.08) vs LGLAX (0.00). LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLAX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and LGLAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. RGACX (2.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. LGLAX (38.21).
| LGLAX | RGACX | LGLAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.282 | -2.667 | 273% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.17 | 2.58 | 666% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.60 | 31.70 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.21 | 41.87 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.85 | 58.36 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers