Ad is loading...
LGLAX vs RGAFX
LGLAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGAFX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$43.80
Change-$0.29 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$72.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
LGLAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGAFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. LGLAX (6.42B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: RGAFX (0.65) vs LGLAX (0.00). LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: LGLAX (14 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. RGAFX (3.45). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. LGLAX (38.21).
| LGLAX | RGAFX | LGLAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.282 | -2.459 | 296% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.17 | 3.45 | 498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.60 | 33.96 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.21 | 45.83 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.85 | 63.63 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...