It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LGMK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LGMK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHLT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LGMK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.61% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.92%.
LGMK is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
LGMK | PHLT | LGMK / PHLT | |
Capitalization | 2.15M | 205M | 1% |
EBITDA | -7.42M | 828K | -897% |
Gain YTD | 8.667 | -5.960 | -145% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 9.65M | 114M | 8% |
Total Cash | 6.68M | 7.25M | 92% |
Total Debt | 65.6K | 5.55M | 1% |
LGMK | PHLT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LGMK's Valuation (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHLT (57) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LGMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHLT’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGMK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PHLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGMK’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's SMR Rating (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LGMK (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to LGMK’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGMK (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PHLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGMK’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LGMK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to LGMK’s over the last 12 months.
LGMK | PHLT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 5 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago90% | 1 day ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGMK and PHLT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGMK and PHLT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGMK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LGMK | 100% | -3.55% | ||
PHLT - LGMK | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
GRAB - LGMK | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
YALA - LGMK | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
TIXT - LGMK | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
ADT - LGMK | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHLT has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHLT jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PHLT | 100% | -2.41% | ||
GHC - PHLT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
FC - PHLT | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
BCO - PHLT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
CASS - PHLT | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
ALLE - PHLT | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More |