Ad is loading...
LGMNX vs RCEEX
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts LGMNX vs RCEEX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N
Price$23.72
Change+$1.30 (+5.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R2E
Price$68.44
Change+$2.53 (+3.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.5B
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMNX vs. RCEEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMNX is a Buy and RCEEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 100B vs. LGMNX (2.53B). RCEEX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: RCEEX (2.71) vs LGMNX (1.43). LGMNX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: LGMNX (8 years) vs RCEEX (11 years). RCEEX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LGMNX (0.82). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: RCEEX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). RCEEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.51 vs. LGMNX (-8.79). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 33.14 vs. LGMNX (3.45).
| LGMNX | RCEEX | LGMNX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.676 | -3.472 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 100B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.71 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.79 | 0.51 | -1,735% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.92 | 3.17 | -281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.45 | 33.14 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...