Ad is loading...
LGMNX vs RCEEX
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts LGMNX vs RCEEX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N
Price$25.14
Change+$0.15 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R2E
Price$69.60
Change+$0.34 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.42B
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMNX vs. RCEEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMNX is a Hold and RCEEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LGMNX (2.92B). RCEEX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: RCEEX (2.85) vs LGMNX (0.43). LGMNX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: LGMNX (8 years) vs RCEEX (10 years). RCEEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. LGMNX (19.00). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: RCEEX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). RCEEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. LGMNX (9.58). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 20.64 vs. LGMNX (1.39).
| LGMNX | RCEEX | LGMNX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.403 | 1.399 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.92B | 106B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 2.85 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 10.18 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.32 | 6.30 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.39 | 20.64 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.20 | - |