Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGMNX vs RCEEX
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts LGMNX vs RCEEX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N
Price$25.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.8B
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R2E
Price$74.60
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.04B
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMNX vs. RCEEX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMNX is a Buy and RCEEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LGMNX (2.8B). RCEEX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: RCEEX (2.62) vs LGMNX (1.38). LGMNX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: LGMNX (8 years) vs RCEEX (11 years). RCEEX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LGMNX (0.82). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: RCEEX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). RCEEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. LGMNX (2.36). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.91 vs. LGMNX (4.06).
| LGMNX | RCEEX | LGMNX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.322 | 9.255 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.8B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 2.62 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 12.97 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.14 | 20.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.06 | 41.91 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement