Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRCX vs RGABX
LGRCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LGRCX vs RGABX
Loomis Sayles Growth C
Price$21.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.14B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.74B
LGRCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRCX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. LGRCX (16.1B). LGRCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGRCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LGRCX (22 years) vs RGABX (23 years). LGRCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRCX: RGABX (250) vs LGRCX (2500). LGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. RGABX (8.35). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 38.11 vs. LGRCX (31.48).
| LGRCX | RGABX | LGRCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.39 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.39 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.066 | 4.095 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 304B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | 8.35 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 32.86 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.48 | 38.11 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.21 | 58.22 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement