Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRNX vs RGABX
LGRNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LGRNX vs RGABX
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$31.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.03B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$73.04
Change+$0.37 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
LGRNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRNX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRNX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. LGRNX (17B). LGRNX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGRNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LGRNX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than LGRNX (0.57). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: RGABX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.57 vs. RGABX (9.39). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.68 vs. RGABX (39.91).
| LGRNX | RGABX | LGRNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.39 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.39 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.181 | 9.410 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 319B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.57 | 9.39 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.47 | 51.97 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.68 | 39.91 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.52 | 68.18 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement