Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LHCAX vs SHSAX
LHCAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LHCAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHCAX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.31B vs. LHCAX (7.3M). LHCAX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: LHCAX (0.33) vs SHSAX (0.22). LHCAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: LHCAX (6 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). LHCAX (3.34) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). LHCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SHSAX (5%) vs SHSAX (5%). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: SHSAX (1000) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.57 vs. SHSAX (-16.26). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.53 vs. SHSAX (-15.72).
| LHCAX | SHSAX | LHCAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.09 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.34 | 1.09 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.175 | -6.182 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 110% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3M | 6.31B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.22 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.57 | -16.26 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.63 | -6.90 | -111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.53 | -15.72 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement