LICYF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.02 (-5.88%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
184.42M
MEG
Price
$12.02
Change
-$0.18 (-1.48%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LICYF vs MEG

Header iconLICYF vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts LICYF vs MEGBanner chart's image
Li-Cycle Holdings
Price$0.32
Change-$0.02 (-5.88%)
Volume$193.01K
Capitalization184.42M
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$12.02
Change-$0.18 (-1.48%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization1.19B
LICYF vs MEG Comparison Chart
Loading...
LICYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LICYF vs. MEG commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICYF is a Hold and MEG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LICYF: $0.32 vs. MEG: $12.20)
Brand notoriety: LICYF and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LICYF: 22% vs. MEG: 96%
Market capitalization -- LICYF: $184.42M vs. MEG: $1.19B
LICYF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $184.42M. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LICYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LICYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LICYF is a better buy in the long-term than MEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LICYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LICYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LICYF and MEG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LICYF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -7.83% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was -17.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MEG is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-4.43% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEG($1.2B) has a higher market cap than LICYF($184M). MEG YTD gains are higher at: -34.232 vs. LICYF (-82.123). MEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. LICYF (-121.4M). LICYF has more cash in the bank: 70.6M vs. MEG (23.2M). MEG has less debt than LICYF: MEG (210M) vs LICYF (351M). MEG has higher revenues than LICYF: MEG (624M) vs LICYF (18.3M).
LICYFMEGLICYF / MEG
Capitalization184M1.2B15%
EBITDA-121.4M31.9M-381%
Gain YTD-82.123-34.232240%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue18.3M624M3%
Total Cash70.6M23.2M304%
Total Debt351M210M167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEG: Fundamental Ratings
MEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LICYFMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LICYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMR16.00-0.22
-1.39%
RMR Group (The)
TTE62.09-2.31
-3.59%
TotalEnergies SE
CRBP4.92-0.28
-5.38%
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings
WFG74.34-4.43
-5.62%
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd
WSBC28.53-2.52
-8.12%
WesBanco

LICYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LICYF has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LICYF jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LICYF
1D Price
Change %
LICYF100%
-5.88%
NVRI - LICYF
43%
Loosely correlated
-7.83%
AQMS - LICYF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
CLH - LICYF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
WM - LICYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
CWST - LICYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More