Advertisement
LILAK vs LUMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LILAK is a Hold and LUMN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LILAK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LILAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LUMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LILAK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LILAK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LUMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LILAK (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -3.94% price change this week, while LUMN (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -2.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
LILAK is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
LUMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| LILAK | LUMN | LILAK / LUMN | |
| Capitalization | 1.44B | 1.58B | 91% |
| EBITDA | 1.55B | -6.09B | -25% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -15.725 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 8.30 | 2.50 | 333% |
| Revenue | 4.51B | 14.6B | 31% |
| Total Cash | 989M | 2.23B | 44% |
| Total Debt | 8.26B | 20.3B | 41% |
LILAK | LUMN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LUMN's Valuation (54) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LILAK (67) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LUMN’s stock grew similarly to LILAK’s over the last 12 months.
LUMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LILAK (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LUMN’s stock grew similarly to LILAK’s over the last 12 months.
LILAK's SMR Rating (97) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LUMN (98) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LILAK’s stock grew similarly to LUMN’s over the last 12 months.
LILAK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LUMN (50) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LILAK’s stock grew similarly to LUMN’s over the last 12 months.
LILAK's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LUMN (97) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LILAK’s stock grew similarly to LUMN’s over the last 12 months.
| LILAK | LUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MEMHX | 38.37 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| MFS Emerging Markets Equity R4 | |||
| PGIOX | 35.39 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| Putnam Focused Equity R | |||
| FGEMX | 122.10 | -0.28 | -0.23% |
| Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesM | |||
| TANDX | 38.11 | -0.31 | -0.81% |
| Castle Tandem No-Load | |||
| BRLVX | 24.52 | -0.21 | -0.85% |
| American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5 | |||
LILAK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LILAK has been closely correlated with LILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LILAK jumps, then LILA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LILAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LILAK | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| LILA - LILAK | 99% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| SHEN - LILAK | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| S - LILAK | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| CCOI - LILAK | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CMCSA - LILAK | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
LUMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUMN has been loosely correlated with ATGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUMN jumps, then ATGN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUMN | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| ATGN - LUMN | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.36% | ||
| CCOI - LUMN | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| OOMA - LUMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.90% | ||
| LILA - LUMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| LILAK - LUMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||