Ad is loading...
LINCX vs VFSNX
LINCX vs VFSNX Comparison
Open Charts LINCX vs VFSNX
Lord Abbett International Opp C
Price$18.53
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.73M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US SmCp Idx Ins
Price$236.65
Change+$1.49 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.2B
LINCX vs VFSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LINCX vs. VFSNX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LINCX is a Buy and VFSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSNX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. LINCX (312M). VFSNX pays higher dividends than LINCX: VFSNX (3.23) vs LINCX (0.94). LINCX was incepted earlier than VFSNX: LINCX (28 years) vs VFSNX (16 years). LINCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VFSNX (0.10). LINCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. VFSNX (17.00). LINCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSNX: LINCX (1500) vs VFSNX (5000000). LINCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. VFSNX (5.59). LINCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.88 vs. VFSNX (46.09).
| LINCX | VFSNX | LINCX / VFSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.10 | 2,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.10 | 2,000% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.743 | 7.783 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312M | 10.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 3.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 5.59 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 17.95 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.88 | 46.09 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.24 | 32.11 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...