Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIRKX vs NWEBX
LIRKX vs NWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIRKX vs. NWEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIRKX is a StrongBuy and NWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIRKX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. NWEBX (219M). NWEBX pays higher dividends than LIRKX: NWEBX (3.11) vs LIRKX (2.87). LIRKX was incepted earlier than NWEBX: LIRKX (14 years) vs NWEBX (18 years). NWEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than LIRKX (0.12). LIRKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWEBX (27.87). NWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIRKX: NWEBX (0) vs LIRKX (5000000). LIRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. NWEBX (0.44). LIRKX return over 5 years is better than : 25.24 vs. NWEBX (2.14).
| LIRKX | NWEBX | LIRKX / NWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 1.21 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.21 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.305 | 5.071 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 219M | 6,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 3.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.38 | 0.44 | 1,920% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.17 | 8.02 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.24 | 2.14 | 1,178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.63 | -3.71 | -1,524% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement