Ad is loading...
LIT vs PHO
LIT vs PHO Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PHO
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.59
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$248.65K
Net Assets1.06B
Invesco Water Resources ETF
Price$66.28
Change-$0.96 (-1.43%)
Volume$407.72K
Net Assets2.16B
LIT vs PHO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PHO commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Buy and PHO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 2.17B vs. LIT (1.06B). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: LIT (5.051) vs PHO (2.204). LIT was incepted earlier than PHO: LIT (15 years) vs PHO (19 years). PHO has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| LIT | PHO | LIT / PHO | |
| Gain YTD | 5.051 | 2.204 | 229% |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 2.17B | 49% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 32.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.52 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.55% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.66% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
PHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHO | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ZWS - PHO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| ACM - PHO | 75% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| FERG - PHO | 74% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| FELE - PHO | 73% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| WTS - PHO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||