LITB
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.12 (-7.36%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
27.71M
PDD
Price
$103.09
Change
-$0.92 (-0.88%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
143.17B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LITB vs PDD

Header iconLITB vs PDD Comparison
Open Charts LITB vs PDDBanner chart's image
LightInTheBox Holding
Price$1.51
Change-$0.12 (-7.36%)
Volume$16.25K
Capitalization27.71M
PDD Holdings
Price$103.09
Change-$0.92 (-0.88%)
Volume$4.64M
Capitalization143.17B
LITB vs PDD Comparison Chart
Loading...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITB vs. PDD commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITB is a StrongBuy and PDD is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LITB: $1.51 vs. PDD: $103.09)
Brand notoriety: LITB: Not notable vs. PDD: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITB: 26% vs. PDD: 35%
Market capitalization -- LITB: $27.71M vs. PDD: $143.17B
LITB [@Internet Retail] is valued at $27.71M. PDD’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $143.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $1.99T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $38.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePDD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LITB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PDD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LITB is a better buy in the long-term than PDD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PDD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LITB is a better buy in the short-term than PDD.

Price Growth

LITB (@Internet Retail) experienced а -18.09% price change this week, while PDD (@Internet Retail) price change was +9.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +100.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

LITB is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

PDD is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+4.42% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDD($143B) has a higher market cap than LITB($27.7M). PDD YTD gains are higher at: 6.289 vs. LITB (-10.292). PDD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 127B vs. LITB (-7.21M). PDD has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. LITB (15M). LITB has less debt than PDD: LITB (5.06M) vs PDD (10.2B). PDD has higher revenues than LITB: PDD (372B) vs LITB (333M).
LITBPDDLITB / PDD
Capitalization27.7M143B0%
EBITDA-7.21M127B-0%
Gain YTD-10.2926.289-164%
P/E RatioN/A9.89-
Revenue333M372B0%
Total Cash15M308B0%
Total Debt5.06M10.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LITB vs PDD: Fundamental Ratings
LITB
PDD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8113
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4278
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1596
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PDD's Valuation (86) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as LITB (99) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PDD’s stock grew similarly to LITB’s over the last 12 months.

PDD's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LITB (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PDD’s stock grew somewhat faster than LITB’s over the last 12 months.

PDD's SMR Rating (21) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is significantly better than the same rating for LITB (98) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PDD’s stock grew significantly faster than LITB’s over the last 12 months.

LITB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDD (78) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that LITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDD’s over the last 12 months.

LITB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDD (96) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that LITB’s stock grew significantly faster than PDD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITBPDD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLIC11.700.24
+2.09%
First of Long Island Corp
AQN5.350.07
+1.33%
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp
DFS185.500.64
+0.35%
Discover Financial Services
BLX38.65-0.06
-0.15%
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA
LGVN1.65-0.10
-5.71%
Longeveron

LITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITB and PDD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITB and PDD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITB
1D Price
Change %
LITB100%
-7.54%
PDD - LITB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
JD - LITB
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
BZUN - LITB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPNG - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BABA - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More

PDD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDD has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDD jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDD
1D Price
Change %
PDD100%
-0.88%
BABA - PDD
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
JD - PDD
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
VIPS - PDD
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
BZUN - PDD
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DADA - PDD
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
More