LITOF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
309.1M
TWOSF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LITOF vs TWOSF

Header iconLITOF vs TWOSF Comparison
Open Charts LITOF vs TWOSFBanner chart's image
Frontier Lithium
Price$0.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.4K
Capitalization309.1M
T2 METALS
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.2M
LITOF vs TWOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITOF vs. TWOSF commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITOF is a Hold and TWOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LITOF: $0.38 vs. TWOSF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: LITOF and TWOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITOF: 25% vs. TWOSF: 2%
Market capitalization -- LITOF: $309.1M vs. TWOSF: $6.2M
LITOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $309.1M. TWOSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTWOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LITOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TWOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TWOSF is a better buy in the long-term than LITOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWOSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TWOSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWOSF is a better buy in the short-term than LITOF.

Price Growth

LITOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.46% price change this week, while TWOSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +15.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

LITOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LITOF($309M) has a higher market cap than TWOSF($6.2M). LITOF YTD gains are higher at: 28.395 vs. TWOSF (-18.498). TWOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.22M vs. LITOF (-20.51M). LITOF has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. TWOSF (1.31M). LITOF (0) and TWOSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LITOFTWOSFLITOF / TWOSF
Capitalization309M6.2M4,981%
EBITDA-20.51M-1.22M1,688%
Gain YTD28.395-18.498-154%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash30.2M1.31M2,312%
Total Debt196KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LITOF vs TWOSF: Fundamental Ratings
LITOF
TWOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LITOF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (59). This means that LITOF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

LITOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (100). This means that LITOF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (98). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (52). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (100). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITOFTWOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLISX24.78N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Equity Income S
MAADX2.42N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Dynamic Value R6
FOPAX23.13N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps A
HRCUX64.65N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec R6
CPTUX92.30N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R5

LITOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITOF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITOF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITOF
1D Price
Change %
LITOF100%
-2.81%
PILBF - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.80%
ERO - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
AAGFF - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.78%
EMX - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
SGML - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
More

TWOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWOSF and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWOSF and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWOSF
1D Price
Change %
TWOSF100%
N/A
ABAT - TWOSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.72%
LITOF - TWOSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
FPRGF - TWOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-36.96%
TWRFF - TWOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMYZF - TWOSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More