LITOF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
TWOSF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

LITOF vs TWOSF

Header iconLITOF vs TWOSF Comparison
Open Charts LITOF vs TWOSFBanner chart's image
Frontier Lithium
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.09K
CapitalizationN/A
T2 METALS
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
LITOF vs TWOSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITOF vs. TWOSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITOF is a Hold and TWOSF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LITOF: $0.28 vs. TWOSF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: LITOF and TWOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITOF: 102% vs. TWOSF: 34%
Market capitalization -- LITOF: $309.1M vs. TWOSF: $6.2M
LITOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $309.1M. TWOSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTWOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LITOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TWOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TWOSF is a better buy in the long-term than LITOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWOSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TWOSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWOSF is a better buy in the short-term than LITOF.

Price Growth

LITOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.02% price change this week, while TWOSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LITOF($309M) has a higher market cap than TWOSF($6.2M). TWOSF YTD gains are higher at: 96.725 vs. LITOF (-50.256). TWOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.22M vs. LITOF (-20.51M). LITOF has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. TWOSF (1.31M). LITOF (0) and TWOSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LITOFTWOSFLITOF / TWOSF
Capitalization309M6.2M4,981%
EBITDA-20.51M-1.22M1,688%
Gain YTD-50.25696.725-52%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash30.2M1.31M2,312%
Total Debt196KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LITOF vs TWOSF: Fundamental Ratings
LITOF
TWOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6393
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9393
SMR RATING
1..100
9895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LITOF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (65). This means that LITOF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

LITOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (93). This means that LITOF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (98). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (91). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (100). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITOFTWOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGU11.21-0.18
-1.58%
Star Group LP
HOG30.48-1.08
-3.42%
Harley-Davidson
PSX111.86-3.97
-3.43%
Phillips 66
AHCO9.67-0.37
-3.69%
AdaptHealth Corp
KNW0.18-0.01
-4.25%
Know Labs

LITOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITOF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITOF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITOF
1D Price
Change %
LITOF100%
+1.08%
PILBF - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
ERO - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
AAGFF - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-12.47%
EMX - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
SGML - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
More

TWOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWOSF and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWOSF and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWOSF
1D Price
Change %
TWOSF100%
-0.13%
ABAT - TWOSF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
LITOF - TWOSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
FPRGF - TWOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
TWRFF - TWOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+10.12%
ALXEF - TWOSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-14.94%
More