Ad is loading...
LITP vs URA
LITP vs URA Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs URA
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Global X Uranium ETF
Price$26.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.65M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs URA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
LITP vs. URA commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Sell and URA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URA has more net assets: 2.96B vs. LITP (5.67M). URA has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: URA (-8.987) vs LITP (-45.178). LITP was incepted earlier than URA: LITP (2 years) vs URA (14 years). LITP has a higher turnover URA (20.03) vs URA (20.03).
| LITP | URA | LITP / URA | |
| Gain YTD | -45.178 | -8.987 | 503% |
| Net Assets | 5.67M | 2.96B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 20.03 | 295% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 5.86 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
More | ||||