Intraday BUY SELL Signals
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +5.92% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +4.57% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 75% Closely correlated | +7.42% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 74% Closely correlated | +7.11% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +8.49% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y