Ad is loading...
LITP vs XLB
LITP vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs XLB
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.98K
CapitalizationN/A
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$94.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.85M
CapitalizationN/A
LITP vs XLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. XLB commentary
Nov 13, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and XLB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.77B vs. LITP (7.49M). XLB has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: XLB (11.377) vs LITP (-31.517). LITP was incepted earlier than XLB: LITP (2 years) vs XLB (26 years). LITP has a higher turnover XLB (3.00) vs XLB (3.00).
| LITP | XLB | LITP / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | -31.517 | 11.377 | -277% |
| Net Assets | 7.49M | 5.77B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 3.00 | 1,967% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.84 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +2.74% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +9.57% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +6.11% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +7.91% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +7.65% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y