Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LITP vs XLB
LITP vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs XLB
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.38
Change-$0.08 (-0.95%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$94.05
Change+$0.48 (+0.51%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
LITP vs XLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. XLB commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a StrongSell and XLB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.94B vs. LITP (7.34M). XLB has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: XLB (10.797) vs LITP (-32.866). LITP was incepted earlier than XLB: LITP (2 years) vs XLB (26 years). LITP has a higher turnover XLB (3.00) vs XLB (3.00).
| LITP | XLB | LITP / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | -32.866 | 10.797 | -304% |
| Net Assets | 7.34M | 5.94B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 3.00 | 1,967% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.84 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +15.09% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y