Advertisement
LKQ vs TXT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKQ is a Hold and TXT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LKQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTXT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LKQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LKQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LKQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LKQ (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.83% price change this week, while TXT (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
LKQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
TXT is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.05% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Aerospace & Defense (+0.80% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| LKQ | TXT | LKQ / TXT | |
| Capitalization | 14.2B | 15.3B | 93% |
| EBITDA | 1.77B | 1.44B | 123% |
| Gain YTD | 2.428 | 10.858 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.10 | 19.09 | 79% |
| Revenue | 13.9B | 13.9B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 299M | 1.25B | 24% |
| Total Debt | 5.64B | 3.73B | 151% |
LKQ | TXT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LKQ's Valuation (20) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as TXT (50) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to TXT’s over the last 12 months.
TXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as LKQ (56) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that TXT’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
TXT's SMR Rating (63) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as LKQ (64) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that TXT’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
TXT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as LKQ (62) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that TXT’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
TXT's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as LKQ (59) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that TXT’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
| LKQ | TXT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 56% | 12 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMIF | 23.92 | 0.28 | +1.19% |
| iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF | |||
| TLTW | 22.55 | 0.13 | +0.58% |
| iShares 20+ Year Trs Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF | |||
| NDAA | 20.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Ned Davis Research 360 Dyn Allc ETF | |||
| AEF | 6.01 | -0.08 | -1.23% |
| abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc. | |||
| PXE | 27.94 | -0.75 | -2.61% |
| Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF | |||
LKQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKQ has been loosely correlated with GTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LKQ jumps, then GTX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LKQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKQ | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| GTX - LKQ | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| THRM - LKQ | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| BWA - LKQ | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| GNTX - LKQ | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| MGA - LKQ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||