LLESF
Price
$3.85
Change
+$0.13 (+3.49%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.83B
MITEF
Price
$18.20
Change
-$0.38 (-2.05%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LLESF vs MITEF

Header iconLLESF vs MITEF Comparison
Open Charts LLESF vs MITEFBanner chart's image
Lendlease
Price$3.85
Change+$0.13 (+3.49%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.83B
Mitsubishi Estate
Price$18.20
Change-$0.38 (-2.05%)
Volume$1.53K
Capitalization15.84B
LLESF vs MITEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MITEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LLESF vs. MITEF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLESF is a Hold and MITEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LLESF: $3.85 vs. MITEF: $18.20)
Brand notoriety: LLESF and MITEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LLESF: 100% vs. MITEF: 169%
Market capitalization -- LLESF: $11.83B vs. MITEF: $15.84B
LLESF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $11.83B. MITEF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $15.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LLESF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMITEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LLESF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MITEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LLESF is a better buy in the long-term than MITEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MITEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MITEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LLESF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MITEF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.33% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MITEF($15.8B) has a higher market cap than LLESF($11.8B). LLESF has higher P/E ratio than MITEF: LLESF (277.78) vs MITEF (13.39). MITEF YTD gains are higher at: 30.000 vs. LLESF (-17.204). MITEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 396B vs. LLESF (349M). MITEF has more cash in the bank: 1.05T vs. LLESF (1.3B). LLESF has less debt than MITEF: LLESF (2.36B) vs MITEF (3.02T). MITEF has higher revenues than LLESF: MITEF (1.35T) vs LLESF (9.78B).
LLESFMITEFLLESF / MITEF
Capitalization11.8B15.8B75%
EBITDA349M396B0%
Gain YTD-17.20430.000-57%
P/E Ratio277.7813.392,075%
Revenue9.78B1.35T1%
Total Cash1.3B1.05T0%
Total Debt2.36B3.02T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LLESF vs MITEF: Fundamental Ratings
LLESF
MITEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7969
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LLESF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MITEF (87). This means that LLESF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MITEF’s over the last 12 months.

MITEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as LLESF (100). This means that MITEF’s stock grew similarly to LLESF’s over the last 12 months.

LLESF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as MITEF (100). This means that LLESF’s stock grew similarly to MITEF’s over the last 12 months.

MITEF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LLESF (60). This means that MITEF’s stock grew similarly to LLESF’s over the last 12 months.

MITEF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as LLESF (79). This means that MITEF’s stock grew similarly to LLESF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LLESFMITEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MITEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYX100.710.93
+0.93%
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
CARU26.97N/A
N/A
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
DSCF23.44-0.04
-0.15%
Discipline Fund ETF
PAPI25.77-0.06
-0.23%
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
MBB93.11-0.31
-0.33%
iShares MBS ETF

LLESF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLESF has been loosely correlated with CDEVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLESF jumps, then CDEVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLESF
1D Price
Change %
LLESF100%
N/A
CDEVF - LLESF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HYSNF - LLESF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEF - LLESF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEGIF - LLESF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNGPF - LLESF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MITEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITEF has been loosely correlated with MTSFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITEF jumps, then MTSFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MITEF
1D Price
Change %
MITEF100%
N/A
MTSFF - MITEF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SURDF - MITEF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEY - MITEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
CDEVF - MITEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRLF - MITEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More