Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMBMX vs NAESX
LMBMX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMBMX vs NAESX
LMBMX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMBMX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMBMX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. LMBMX (155M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMBMX: NAESX (1.10) vs LMBMX (0.35). LMBMX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMBMX (14 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMBMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBMX: NAESX (0) vs LMBMX (1000000). LMBMX (25.33) and NAESX (24.75) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. LMBMX (18.72).
| LMBMX | NAESX | LMBMX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.17 | 441% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.000 | 18.339 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.10 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 24.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.40 | 58.17 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.72 | 42.07 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.41 | 156.41 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers