Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMBMX vs NAESX
LMBMX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMBMX vs NAESX
LMBMX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMBMX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMBMX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. LMBMX (151M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMBMX: NAESX (1.09) vs LMBMX (0.34). LMBMX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMBMX (14 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMBMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBMX: NAESX (0) vs LMBMX (1000000). NAESX (14.15) and LMBMX (13.57) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.24 vs. LMBMX (11.02).
| LMBMX | NAESX | LMBMX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.17 | 441% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.733 | 12.861 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.09 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | 14.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.72 | 50.08 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 32.24 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.58 | 150.75 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement