Advertisement
LMFA vs PDD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMFA is a Hold and PDD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LMFA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePDD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LMFA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PDD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMFA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LMFA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PDD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LMFA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +21.43% price change this week, while PDD (@Internet Retail) price change was +9.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +113.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
LMFA is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
PDD is expected to report earnings on Nov 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.71% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Internet Retail (+2.10% weekly)The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
| LMFA | PDD | LMFA / PDD | |
| Capitalization | 8.4M | 159B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 123B | - |
| Gain YTD | 120.465 | 15.125 | 796% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.05 | 11.96 | 17% |
| Revenue | -5.67M | 403B | -0% |
| Total Cash | 469K | 365B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 285K | 11.3B | 0% |
LMFA | PDD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMFA's Valuation (69) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PDD (79) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that LMFA’s stock grew similarly to PDD’s over the last 12 months.
PDD's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as LMFA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PDD’s stock grew similarly to LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
PDD's SMR Rating (27) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMFA (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PDD’s stock grew significantly faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
LMFA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PDD (52) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that LMFA’s stock grew similarly to PDD’s over the last 12 months.
PDD's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as LMFA (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PDD’s stock grew similarly to LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
| LMFA | PDD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
Advertisement
LMFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMFA has been loosely correlated with SOFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMFA jumps, then SOFI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMFA | 100% | +46.75% | ||
| SOFI - LMFA | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| URI - LMFA | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.72% | ||
| SYF - LMFA | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| UPST - LMFA | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| GATX - LMFA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||
PDD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDD has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDD jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| BABA - PDD | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| JD - PDD | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| VIPS - PDD | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| BZUN - PDD | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| RERE - PDD | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||