Ad is loading...
LMGAX vs RPMGX
LMGAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts LMGAX vs RPMGX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$24.57
Change-$0.11 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.02M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$94.54
Change+$0.29 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.04B
LMGAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGAX vs. RPMGX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGAX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. LMGAX (553M). LMGAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LMGAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: LMGAX (30 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). LMGAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). LMGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: LMGAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. RPMGX (-10.08). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 9.38 vs. LMGAX (6.56).
| LMGAX | RPMGX | LMGAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.75 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.75 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.643 | -5.495 | 48% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 553M | 27B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | -10.08 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.20 | 5.34 | 678% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.56 | 9.38 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.08 | 16.74 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers