Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMLCX vs VFIDX
LMLCX vs VFIDX Comparison
Open Charts LMLCX vs VFIDX
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets369.32M
Vanguard Interm-Term Investment-Grde Adm
Price$8.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.64B
LMLCX vs VFIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLCX vs. VFIDX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLCX is a Hold and VFIDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFIDX has more cash in the bank: 36.6B vs. LMLCX (369M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than VFIDX: LMLCX (6.53) vs VFIDX (4.82). LMLCX was incepted earlier than VFIDX: LMLCX (19 years) vs VFIDX (25 years). VFIDX (0.09) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). VFIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). LMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFIDX: LMLCX (0) vs VFIDX (50000). LMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. VFIDX (0.91). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. VFIDX (-16.85).
| LMLCX | VFIDX | LMLCX / VFIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.09 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 3.154 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 50000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 369M | 36.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.53 | 4.82 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | 0.91 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.94 | 0.41 | 5,149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.70 | -16.85 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.24 | 1.13 | 4,195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement