Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNCAX vs PFIPX
LNCAX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts LNCAX vs PFIPX
Ladenburg Income A
Price$10.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.06M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
LNCAX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNCAX vs. PFIPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNCAX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. LNCAX (10.1M). PFIPX (2.49) and LNCAX (2.48) have matching dividends . LNCAX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: LNCAX (10 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). LNCAX (2.22) is less costly to investors than PFIPX (1.26). PFIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.80 vs. LNCAX (6.81). PFIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNCAX: PFIPX (0) vs LNCAX (1000). PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. LNCAX (3.53). PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.96 vs. LNCAX (5.38).
| LNCAX | PFIPX | LNCAX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.26 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.26 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.994 | 3.861 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1M | 2.22B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.49 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.53 | 4.89 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.71 | 17.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.38 | 10.96 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement