Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNCAX vs PFIPX
LNCAX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts LNCAX vs PFIPX
Ladenburg Income A
Price$10.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.27M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
LNCAX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNCAX vs. PFIPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNCAX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. LNCAX (10.3M). PFIPX (2.49) and LNCAX (2.41) have matching dividends . LNCAX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: LNCAX (10 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). LNCAX (2.22) is less costly to investors than PFIPX (1.26). PFIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.80 vs. LNCAX (6.81). PFIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNCAX: PFIPX (0) vs LNCAX (1000). PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.40 vs. LNCAX (2.31). PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.52 vs. LNCAX (6.53).
| LNCAX | PFIPX | LNCAX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.26 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.26 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.108 | 5.947 | 86% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 2.25B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 2.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | 6.40 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.03 | 15.01 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.53 | 11.52 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement