LNNGY
Price
$48.26
Change
-$0.08 (-0.17%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
15.89B
MCFT
Price
$16.63
Change
+$0.37 (+2.28%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
404.04M
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LNNGY vs MCFT

Header iconLNNGY vs MCFT Comparison
Open Charts LNNGY vs MCFTBanner chart's image
Li Ning
Price$48.26
Change-$0.08 (-0.17%)
Volume$5.55K
Capitalization15.89B
MasterCraft Boat Holdings
Price$16.63
Change+$0.37 (+2.28%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization404.04M
LNNGY vs MCFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LNNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNNGY vs. MCFT commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNNGY is a Hold and MCFT is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LNNGY: $49.10 vs. MCFT: $16.60)
Brand notoriety: LNNGY: Not notable vs. MCFT: Notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNNGY: 89% vs. MCFT: 151%
Market capitalization -- LNNGY: $15.89B vs. MCFT: $404.04M
LNNGY [@Recreational Products] is valued at $15.89B. MCFT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $404.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNNGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LNNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNNGY is a better buy in the long-term than MCFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNNGY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNNGY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LNNGY and MCFT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LNNGY (@Recreational Products) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while MCFT (@Recreational Products) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNNGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

MCFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.72% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNNGY($15.9B) has a higher market cap than MCFT($404M). LNNGY has higher P/E ratio than MCFT: LNNGY (26.32) vs MCFT (7.14). LNNGY YTD gains are higher at: -5.231 vs. MCFT (-12.952). LNNGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.97B vs. MCFT (90M). LNNGY has higher revenues than MCFT: LNNGY (25.8B) vs MCFT (537M).
LNNGYMCFTLNNGY / MCFT
Capitalization15.9B404M3,936%
EBITDA6.97B90M7,746%
Gain YTD-5.231-12.95240%
P/E Ratio26.327.14369%
Revenue25.8B537M4,804%
Total CashN/A109M-
Total DebtN/A51.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNNGY vs MCFT: Fundamental Ratings
LNNGY
MCFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6660
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
1091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7374
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4365

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNNGY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCFT (91) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that LNNGY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

MCFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNNGY (100) in the null industry. This means that MCFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCFT (91) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that LNNGY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MCFT (74) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to MCFT’s over the last 12 months.

MCFT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNNGY (61) in the null industry. This means that MCFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNNGYMCFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LNNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSLAX14.95N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
BHBFX24.38N/A
N/A
Madison Dividend Income Y
FSATX15.00N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
NEJYX18.07N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Y
MSBQX11.28N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley American Resilience R6

LNNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNNGY has been closely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNNGY jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNNGY
1D Price
Change %
LNNGY100%
+1.74%
ANPDY - LNNGY
74%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
ANPDF - LNNGY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAS - LNNGY
28%
Poorly correlated
+14.58%
SMNNY - LNNGY
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
MCFT - LNNGY
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
More

MCFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCFT has been closely correlated with MBUU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCFT jumps, then MBUU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCFT
1D Price
Change %
MCFT100%
+2.09%
MBUU - MCFT
71%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
BC - MCFT
67%
Closely correlated
+5.70%
WGO - MCFT
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
LCII - MCFT
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
PII - MCFT
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
More