LNVGF vs TSHTY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNVGF is a Hold and TSHTY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNVGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSHTY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LNVGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TSHTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
LNVGF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while TSHTY (@Computer Peripherals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNVGF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+0.49% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| LNVGF | TSHTY | LNVGF / TSHTY | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 1.62B | 857% |
| EBITDA | 3.81B | 4.11B | 93% |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | 0.903 | -1,139% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.32 | 400.00 | 2% |
| Revenue | 61.9B | 491B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 5.63B | 32.4B | 17% |
| Total Debt | 4.89B | 1.98B | 247% |
LNVGF | TSHTY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNVGF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TSHTY (91). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew significantly faster than TSHTY’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSHTY (100). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSHTY’s over the last 12 months.
TSHTY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGF (98). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew similarly to LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
TSHTY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGF (42). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew similarly to LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
TSHTY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNVGF (70). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew significantly faster than LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
LNVGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNVGF has been loosely correlated with LNVGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNVGF jumps, then LNVGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNVGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNVGF | 100% | -8.11% | ||
| LNVGY - LNVGF | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| QUBT - LNVGF | 2% Poorly correlated | +6.77% | ||
| CRSR - LNVGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| RCAT - LNVGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -8.57% | ||
| TSHTY - LNVGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TSHTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TSHTY and IONQ have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSHTY and IONQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSHTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSHTY | 100% | N/A | ||
| IONQ - TSHTY | 24% Poorly correlated | +17.25% | ||
| CRSR - TSHTY | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| LNVGY - TSHTY | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
| QUBT - TSHTY | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.77% | ||
| TBIIF - TSHTY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||