Advertisement
LNW vs PFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNW is a Buy and PFS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LNW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LNW (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +12.35% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+2.34% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| LNW | PFS | LNW / PFS | |
| Capitalization | 9.08B | 1.1B | 827% |
| EBITDA | 898M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.928 | -3.647 | -300% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.73 | 8.49 | 680% |
| Revenue | 2.9B | 479M | 606% |
| Total Cash | 425M | 189M | 225% |
| Total Debt | 3.93B | 1.46B | 269% |
LNW | PFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFS's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNW (71) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNW’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as PFS (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that LNW’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LNW (21) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to LNW’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LNW (51) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to LNW’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNW (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew significantly faster than LNW’s over the last 12 months.
| LNW | PFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 14 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
LNW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNW has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNW jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNW | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| BYD - LNW | 76% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| PENN - LNW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| CNTY - LNW | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.25% | ||
| RRR - LNW | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| CZR - LNW | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||
PFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| BHLB - PFS | 91% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| HOPE - PFS | 91% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| TCBK - PFS | 89% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| ABCB - PFS | 89% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| EBC - PFS | 89% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||