Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNYFX vs RMUYX
LNYFX vs RMUYX Comparison
Open Charts LNYFX vs RMUYX
Lord Abbett New York Tax Free F
Price$10.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets564.31M
Invesco Rochester® New York Municipals Y
Price$13.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
LNYFX vs RMUYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNYFX vs. RMUYX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNYFX is a Hold and RMUYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMUYX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. LNYFX (564M). RMUYX pays higher dividends than LNYFX: RMUYX (4.79) vs LNYFX (3.52). LNYFX was incepted earlier than RMUYX: LNYFX (18 years) vs RMUYX (25 years). RMUYX (1.03) is less costly to investors than LNYFX (0.68). LNYFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RMUYX (13.00). LNYFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMUYX: LNYFX (0) vs RMUYX (1000). LNYFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.17 vs. RMUYX (-6.68). RMUYX return over 5 years is better than : -0.34 vs. LNYFX (-2.35).
| LNYFX | RMUYX | LNYFX / RMUYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.03 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.03 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.858 | -7.047 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 564M | 3.91B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 4.79 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.17 | -6.68 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.91 | 1.15 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.35 | -0.34 | 688% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.07 | 31.93 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement