Ad is loading...
LOLDX vs LSCSX
LOLDX vs LSCSX Comparison
Open Charts LOLDX vs LSCSX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.01B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond R4
Price$9.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets585.16M
LOLDX vs LSCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOLDX vs. LSCSX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOLDX is a Hold and LSCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. LSCSX (585M). LOLDX pays higher dividends than LSCSX: LOLDX (5.23) vs LSCSX (4.64). LOLDX was incepted earlier than LSCSX: LOLDX (8 years) vs LSCSX (8 years). LSCSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.31). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LSCSX (78.00). LOLDX (0) and LSCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. LSCSX (6.28). LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. LSCSX (12.62).
| LOLDX | LSCSX | LOLDX / LSCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.65 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.81 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.573 | 1.443 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42B | 585M | 7,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.23 | 4.64 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.28 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 11.50 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 12.62 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...