Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOLDX vs PLCCX
LOLDX vs PLCCX Comparison
Open Charts LOLDX vs PLCCX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.46B
PIMCO Low Duration C-2
Price$9.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51B
LOLDX vs PLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOLDX vs. PLCCX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOLDX is a Hold and PLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42.5B vs. PLCCX (6.51B). LOLDX pays higher dividends than PLCCX: LOLDX (5.29) vs PLCCX (3.35). LOLDX was incepted earlier than PLCCX: LOLDX (8 years) vs PLCCX (5 years). PLCCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). PLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 497.00 vs. LOLDX (92.00). LOLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLCCX: LOLDX (0) vs PLCCX (1000). LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.73 vs. PLCCX (4.44).
| LOLDX | PLCCX | LOLDX / PLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.34 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.34 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.983 | 2.233 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5B | 6.51B | 653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.29 | 3.35 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | 4.44 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.69 | 10.00 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.19 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers