Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOLDX vs PLCCX
LOLDX vs PLCCX Comparison
Open Charts LOLDX vs PLCCX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.34B
PIMCO Low Duration C-2
Price$9.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
LOLDX vs PLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOLDX vs. PLCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOLDX is a Hold and PLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. PLCCX (6.63B). LOLDX pays higher dividends than PLCCX: LOLDX (5.28) vs PLCCX (3.35). LOLDX was incepted earlier than PLCCX: LOLDX (8 years) vs PLCCX (5 years). PLCCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). PLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 497.00 vs. LOLDX (92.00). LOLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLCCX: LOLDX (0) vs PLCCX (1000). LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. PLCCX (4.78).
| LOLDX | PLCCX | LOLDX / PLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.34 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.34 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.509 | 1.847 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 6.63B | 638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.28 | 3.35 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 4.78 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.47 | 9.43 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.25 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement