LOMA
Price
$11.22
Change
-$0.68 (-5.71%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
12 days until earnings call
TGLS
Price
$69.22
Change
-$1.77 (-2.49%)
Updated
Feb 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.45B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LOMA vs TGLS

Header iconLOMA vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts LOMA vs TGLSBanner chart's image
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$11.22
Change-$0.68 (-5.71%)
Volume$624.21K
Capitalization1.01B
Tecnoglass
Price$69.22
Change-$1.77 (-2.49%)
Volume$2.14K
Capitalization2.45B
LOMA vs TGLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMA vs. TGLS commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMA is a Hold and TGLS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (LOMA: $11.90 vs. TGLS: $70.99)
Brand notoriety: LOMA and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMA: 90% vs. TGLS: 145%
Market capitalization -- LOMA: $1.01B vs. TGLS: $2.45B
LOMA [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.01B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LOMA and TGLS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the short-term than TGLS.

Price Growth

LOMA (@Construction Materials) experienced а +2.32% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.79% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGLS($2.45B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.01B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: LOMA (20.19) vs TGLS (13.39). LOMA YTD gains are higher at: -0.335 vs. TGLS (-10.502). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.9B vs. TGLS (292M). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 20.9B vs. TGLS (132M). TGLS has less debt than LOMA: TGLS (170M) vs LOMA (97.9B). LOMA has higher revenues than TGLS: LOMA (136B) vs TGLS (833M).
LOMATGLSLOMA / TGLS
Capitalization1.01B2.45B41%
EBITDA39.9B292M13,664%
Gain YTD-0.335-10.5023%
P/E Ratio20.1913.39151%
Revenue136B833M16,327%
Total Cash20.9B132M15,833%
Total Debt97.9B170M57,588%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMA vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
LOMA
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1752
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
5137
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (4) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (18) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (8) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's SMR Rating (37) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LOMA (51) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (51) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (48) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMATGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBAKX30.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Balanced K
SPGRX19.10N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class S
FWTFX35.54N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
BAREX15.25N/A
N/A
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Inv A
HFDTX19.73N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R5

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
+0.42%
CRH - LOMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
CX - LOMA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
KNF - LOMA
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
TGLS - LOMA
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
HCMLY - LOMA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
-2.07%
BCC - TGLS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
SUM - TGLS
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EXP - TGLS
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
CRH - TGLS
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
KNF - TGLS
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More