LOMA
Price
$11.35
Change
-$0.38 (-3.24%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.34B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGLS
Price
$42.09
Change
-$1.50 (-3.44%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.93B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOMA vs TGLS

Header iconLOMA vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts LOMA vs TGLSBanner chart's image
LOMA vs TGLS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMA vs. TGLS commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMA is a Hold and TGLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (LOMA: $11.73 vs. TGLS: $43.59)
Brand notoriety: LOMA and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMA: 125% vs. TGLS: 59%
Market capitalization -- LOMA: $1.34B vs. TGLS: $1.93B
LOMA [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.34B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $69.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than TGLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LOMA and TGLS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LOMA (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.73% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.90% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGLS($1.93B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.34B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: LOMA (54.98) vs TGLS (13.50). LOMA YTD gains are higher at: -9.421 vs. TGLS (-13.072). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199B vs. TGLS (267M). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 46.8B vs. TGLS (94.4M). TGLS has less debt than LOMA: TGLS (200M) vs LOMA (309B). LOMA has higher revenues than TGLS: LOMA (850B) vs TGLS (1.01B).
LOMATGLSLOMA / TGLS
Capitalization1.34B1.93B69%
EBITDA199B267M74,532%
Gain YTD-9.421-13.07272%
P/E Ratio54.9813.50407%
Revenue850B1.01B84,158%
Total Cash46.8B94.4M49,576%
Total Debt309B200M154,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMA vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
LOMA
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4365
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
590
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (20) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (65) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (100) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (61) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGLS (90) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMATGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMNY26.790.03
+0.09%
First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF
DSPY64.29N/A
N/A
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF
PSF19.38-0.10
-0.53%
COHEN & STEERS SELECT PREFERRED AND Income FUND
BAR41.92-0.70
-1.64%
GraniteShares Gold Trust
HODU8.96-0.28
-3.07%
Direxion Daily HOOD Bull 2X ETF

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
+6.73%
CX - LOMA
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
CRH - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
JHX - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
TGLS - LOMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
More