LOMA
Price
$9.92
Change
-$0.41 (-3.97%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGLS
Price
$42.77
Change
+$1.34 (+3.23%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.9B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOMA vs TGLS

LOMA vs TGLS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMA vs. TGLS commentary
Aug 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMA is a StrongBuy and TGLS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2026
Stock price -- (LOMA: $9.92 vs. TGLS: $42.77)
Brand notoriety: LOMA and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMA: 170% vs. TGLS: 76%
Market capitalization -- LOMA: $1.27B vs. TGLS: $1.9B
LOMA [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.27B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $67.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LOMA and TGLS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

LOMA (@Construction Materials) experienced а -10.06% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was -7.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.52% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGLS($1.9B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.27B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: LOMA (39.36) vs TGLS (15.01). TGLS YTD gains are higher at: -14.430 vs. LOMA (-23.398). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199B vs. TGLS (267M). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 46.8B vs. TGLS (41.7M). TGLS has less debt than LOMA: TGLS (200M) vs LOMA (309B). LOMA has higher revenues than TGLS: LOMA (850B) vs TGLS (1.01B).
LOMATGLSLOMA / TGLS
Capitalization1.27B1.9B67%
EBITDA199B267M74,532%
Gain YTD-23.398-14.430162%
P/E Ratio39.3615.01262%
Revenue850B1.01B84,158%
Total Cash46.8B41.7M112,230%
Total Debt309B200M154,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMA vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
LOMA
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6171
SMR RATING
1..100
7545
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3479
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (19) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (71) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's SMR Rating (45) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LOMA (75) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LOMA (71) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGLS (79) in the Building Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMATGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVLX15.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Value
UVALX22.74N/A
N/A
Victory Value
VSFSX30.19N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Value R6
JSJAX16.70N/A
N/A
JHancock Small Cap Dynamic Growth A
BALFX41.03-0.03
-0.07%
American Funds American Balanced F-1

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-3.97%
CX - LOMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
CRH - LOMA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
AMRZ - LOMA
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.83%
TGLS - LOMA
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
More

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
+3.23%
BCC - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
EXP - TGLS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
VMC - TGLS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
AMRZ - TGLS
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
TTAM - TGLS
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More