MLM
Price
$564.85
Change
+$18.48 (+3.38%)
Updated
Jul 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.96B
6 days until earnings call
TGLS
Price
$75.02
Change
-$0.30 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 18, 02:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.45B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs TGLS

Header iconMLM vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts MLM vs TGLSBanner chart's image
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$564.85
Change+$18.48 (+3.38%)
Volume$4.58K
Capitalization37.96B
Tecnoglass
Price$75.02
Change-$0.30 (-0.40%)
Volume$294
Capitalization2.45B
MLM vs TGLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. TGLS commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Hold and TGLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MLM: $553.09 vs. TGLS: $75.31)
Brand notoriety: MLM and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 81% vs. TGLS: 45%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $37.96B vs. TGLS: $2.45B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $37.96B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the long-term than MLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.14% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($38B) has a higher market cap than TGLS($2.45B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: MLM (31.28) vs TGLS (13.39). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 7.415 vs. TGLS (-4.670). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.17B vs. TGLS (292M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. TGLS (132M). TGLS has less debt than MLM: TGLS (170M) vs MLM (4.73B). MLM has higher revenues than TGLS: MLM (6.78B) vs TGLS (833M).
MLMTGLSMLM / TGLS
Capitalization38B2.45B1,554%
EBITDA2.17B292M743%
Gain YTD7.415-4.670-159%
P/E Ratio31.2813.39234%
Revenue6.78B833M814%
Total Cash1.27B132M964%
Total Debt4.73B170M2,779%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
189
SMR RATING
1..100
6235
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
920
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGLS's Valuation (18) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (86) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MLM (18) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's SMR Rating (35) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MLM (62) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (55) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (20) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMTGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFFE23.171.30
+5.94%
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
LEXI32.730.14
+0.44%
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
SDHY16.640.05
+0.30%
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund
EAGL30.100.09
+0.29%
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
PBAP27.75N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Apr

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
+1.26%
CRH - TGLS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
BCC - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
EXP - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
KNF - TGLS
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
VMC - TGLS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More