LOUP vs ONTO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOUP is a Buy and ONTO is a Buy.
ONTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LOUP | ONTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NOVZ | 38.41 | 0.66 | +1.75% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome Nov ETF | |||
| PSMO | 26.96 | 0.10 | +0.39% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF | |||
| BSCV | 16.29 | 0.06 | +0.37% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| IWS | 121.80 | -0.20 | -0.16% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| PALC | 46.25 | -0.11 | -0.24% |
| Pacer Lunt Large Cap Mlt Ftr Alt ETF | |||
LOUP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOUP has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOUP jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOUP | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| LRCX - LOUP | 79% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| VRT - LOUP | 78% Closely correlated | +3.66% | ||
| ONTO - LOUP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CLS - LOUP | 75% Closely correlated | -3.35% | ||
| HOOD - LOUP | 73% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
More | ||||
ONTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONTO has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONTO jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONTO | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| KLAC - ONTO | 84% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| LRCX - ONTO | 83% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| AMAT - ONTO | 82% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CAMT - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| VECO - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||