LOUP vs ONTO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOUP is a StrongSell and ONTO is a Sell.
ONTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LOUP | ONTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 54% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGW | 58.32 | 0.26 | +0.45% |
| Invesco S&P Global Water ETF | |||
| COMB | 19.75 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF | |||
| IWP | 127.95 | -1.16 | -0.90% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| PEJ | 51.60 | -0.78 | -1.49% |
| Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF | |||
| MSTQ | 32.90 | -0.81 | -2.40% |
| LHA Market State™ Tactical Q ETF | |||
LOUP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOUP has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOUP jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOUP | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| ONTO - LOUP | 71% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| VRT - LOUP | 68% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| GFS - LOUP | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| CRWD - LOUP | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| NU - LOUP | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.44% | ||
More | ||||
ONTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONTO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONTO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONTO | 100% | -3.77% | ||
| LRCX - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| AMAT - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | -9.20% | ||
| VECO - ONTO | 79% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| KLAC - ONTO | 79% Closely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| NVMI - ONTO | 77% Closely correlated | -6.09% | ||
More | ||||