Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSEBX
LPFAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.85
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.04
Change+$0.35 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
LPFAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. LPFAX (59.3M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFAX (11.03) vs RSEBX (0.23). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFAX (7 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. LPFAX (7.65). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. RSEBX (16.78).
| LPFAX | RSEBX | LPFAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.45 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.45 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 9.281 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.03 | 0.23 | 4,732% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 9.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.42 | 31.03 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | 16.78 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement