Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSEBX
LPFAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.45
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
LPFAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. LPFAX (57.9M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFAX (11.03) vs RSEBX (0.23). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFAX (7 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. LPFAX (7.12). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.34 vs. RSEBX (18.70).
| LPFAX | RSEBX | LPFAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.45 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.45 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.721 | 8.373 | 44% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.9M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.03 | 0.23 | 4,732% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 9.90 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.73 | 33.34 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.34 | 18.70 | 264% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.22 | - |