LQDT
Price
$24.82
Change
+$0.33 (+1.35%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
775.21M
55 days until earnings call
QVCGP
Price
$9.20
Change
-$0.63 (-6.41%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

LQDT vs QVCGP

Header iconLQDT vs QVCGP Comparison
Open Charts LQDT vs QVCGPBanner chart's image
Liquidity Services
Price$24.82
Change+$0.33 (+1.35%)
Volume$6.38K
Capitalization775.21M
QVC Group
Price$9.20
Change-$0.63 (-6.41%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
LQDT vs QVCGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LQDT vs. QVCGP commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQDT is a StrongBuy and QVCGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LQDT: $24.83 vs. QVCGP: $9.12)
Brand notoriety: LQDT and QVCGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LQDT: 82% vs. QVCGP: 79%
Market capitalization -- LQDT: $775.21M vs. QVCGP: $0
LQDT [@Internet Retail] is valued at $775.21M. QVCGP’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.27T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $44.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LQDT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQVCGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QVCGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than QVCGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LQDT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QVCGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LQDT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QVCGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QVCGP is a better buy in the short-term than LQDT.

Price Growth

LQDT (@Internet Retail) experienced а +6.25% price change this week, while QVCGP (@Internet Retail) price change was +61.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +5.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

QVCGP is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+5.09% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LQDT YTD gains are higher at: -24.156 vs. QVCGP (-69.839). LQDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.2M vs. QVCGP (-576M). QVCGP has more cash in the bank: 833M vs. LQDT (149M). LQDT has less debt than QVCGP: LQDT (14.8M) vs QVCGP (5.59B). QVCGP has higher revenues than LQDT: QVCGP (9.8B) vs LQDT (439M).
LQDTQVCGPLQDT / QVCGP
Capitalization775MN/A-
EBITDA40.2M-576M-7%
Gain YTD-24.156-69.83935%
P/E Ratio31.43N/A-
Revenue439M9.8B4%
Total Cash149M833M18%
Total Debt14.8M5.59B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQDTQVCGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOXF26.370.23
+0.88%
Fox Factory Holding Corp
SEIC85.180.02
+0.02%
SEI Investments Company
FCNCO21.38-0.15
-0.70%
First Citizens BancShares
ADSE9.72-0.08
-0.77%
Ads-Tec Energy PLC
BEEM1.48-0.07
-4.52%
Beam Global

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with BYON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then BYON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
+0.16%
BYON - LQDT
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.21%
EBAY - LQDT
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
CVNA - LQDT
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
QVCGP - LQDT
25%
Poorly correlated
+43.11%
SE - LQDT
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More

QVCGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QVCGP and QVCGA have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QVCGP and QVCGA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QVCGP
1D Price
Change %
QVCGP100%
+43.11%
QVCGA - QVCGP
33%
Poorly correlated
+33.77%
MELI - QVCGP
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
AMZN - QVCGP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
W - QVCGP
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
RVLV - QVCGP
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.34%
More