In the semiconductor sector fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) expansion, LRCX and LSCC represent distinct opportunities for investors and traders. LRCX, a leader in wafer fabrication equipment, supports chip production at scale, while LSCC excels in low-power FPGAs for edge computing. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers amid broader chip demand. Traders seeking momentum may eye LSCC, while those prioritizing profitability could favor LRCX. Understanding these dynamics aids in portfolio diversification within the volatile tech landscape.
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) designs and manufactures semiconductor processing equipment for etching, deposition, and cleaning in integrated circuit fabrication. Operating in a market projected for sustained AI-driven growth, LRCX benefits from robust demand from major foundries. In recent market activity, the stock has risen approximately 12% over the past month and 51% YTD, trading around $257 with a market cap exceeding $320 billion. Key influences include strong quarterly earnings surprises, with adjusted EPS guidance above estimates and operating margins expanding to 35%. Analyst upgrades and breakout above the 20-day moving average have bolstered sentiment, though exposure to China trade curbs adds caution. Profitability remains strong at 30.9% margins and a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 48.7.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) develops FPGAs and related software for edge AI, industrial, and automotive applications, emphasizing low-power programmable solutions. Positioned in high-growth niches like embedded vision and real-time sensor fusion, LSCC has seen shares surge 66% YTD and nearly 29% in the past month, nearing $122 with a $17 billion market cap. Recent catalysts include partnerships for edge AI and awards in AI excellence, alongside new 52-week highs. Momentum stems from AI tailwinds, with shares up over 150% in the past year. However, thin profitability at 0.6% margins and an elevated trailing P/E of over 6,000 reflect earnings pressure from low EPS of $0.02. Beta of 1.65 signals heightened volatility.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like 5-minute scalps, 60-minute swings, and multi-agent systems. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from 24% to 164%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Semiconductor-focused bots, such as those trading LRCX alongside peers like AMAT and ASML, deliver up to 98% annualized returns with 63% win rates and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 6. Others blend semis with energy for 57-93% returns. Ideal for current volatile markets, these bots adapt via AI/ML models. Traders can explore and copy these high-conviction signals for potential edge in stock selection.
LRCX and LSCC both thrive in AI-enabled semiconductors but diverge in business models: LRCX supplies capital-intensive fab equipment tied to foundry expansions, offering cyclical stability and higher barriers to entry, while LSCC targets nimble FPGA designs for edge devices, enabling faster innovation in automotive and industrial IoT. Growth drivers contrast with LSCC's superior recent momentum (66% YTD vs. 51%) but LRCX's scale yields better fundamentals like 22B revenue versus 523M. Risk factors include trade tensions for LRCX and valuation stretch for LSCC (P/S 32 vs. 15). Market sentiment favors both amid AI hype, though LRCX garners more analyst optimism.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward LRCX for its consistent trend strength, superior profitability, and inclusion in top-performing semiconductor bots with 60-98% annualized returns. While LSCC exhibits stronger short-term momentum, LRCX's larger scale, 31% margins, and positive earnings revisions position it better for sustained AI-driven upside with lower relative risk. This probabilistic edge reflects observable catalysts like equipment demand over niche FPGA volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LRCX’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileLSCC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LRCX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSCC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +5.38% price change this week, while LSCC (@Semiconductors) price change was +4.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.72%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.77%.
LRCX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
LSCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-0.05% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| LRCX | LSCC | LRCX / LSCC | |
| Capitalization | 464B | 19.8B | 2,343% |
| EBITDA | 8.07B | 77.5M | 10,415% |
| Gain YTD | 139.701 | 111.022 | 126% |
| P/E Ratio | 77.42 | 1109.07 | 7% |
| Revenue | 21.7B | 574M | 3,780% |
| Total Cash | 1.68B | 140M | 1,197% |
| Total Debt | 3.73B | 39.9M | 9,358% |
LRCX | LSCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LRCX's Valuation (89) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LSCC (99) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LSCC (27) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's SMR Rating (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for LSCC (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew significantly faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (35) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LRCX (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.
| LRCX | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +5.27% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 86% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| KLIC - LSCC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| ENTG - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| KLAC - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| LRCX - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| VECO - LSCC | 68% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
More | ||||